top of page

One night a feast was held in the palace, and there came a man and prostrated himself before the prince, and all the feasters looked upon him; and they saw that one of his eyes was out and that the empty socket bled. And the prince inquired of him, “What has befallen you?” And the man replied, “O prince, I am by profession a thief, and this night, because there was no moon, I went to rob the money-changer’s shop, and as I climbed in through the window I made a mistake and entered the weaver’s shop, and in the dark I ran into the weaver’s loom and my eye was plucked out. And now, O prince, I ask for justice upon the weaver.” 

Then the prince sent for the weaver and he came, and it was decreed that one of his eyes should be plucked out. 

“O prince,” said the weaver, “the decree is just. It is right that one of my eyes be taken. And yet, alas! both are necessary to me in order that I may see the two sides of the cloth that I weave. But I have a neighbour, a cobbler, who has also two eyes, and in his trade both eyes are not necessary.” 

Then the prince sent for the cobbler. And he came. And they took out one of the cobbler’s two eyes. 

And justice was satisfied.

 

Figurative Language

 

Metaphor:

  • "both are necessary to me in order that i may see the two sides of the cloth"

 

Personification:

  • "but i have a neighbor, a cobbler,

 

Software Findings Reoccurring Words

  • Prince, Eyes, Weaver, Came

  • With these findings  we can conclude that this piece is about a prince who rules over the societies views.

 

Interpretation

My interpretation of "War" speaks about justice in a corrupt place where war and revenge are sought out to regain pride. Gibran spreads the message that ones act of anger can result in a domino affect. If affects all around it. 

 

WAR

bottom of page